seventh guardian a écrit :
On 7/12/06, Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 11:24:57PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Having looked at FvwmGtk code, I realise there's no need for gnome
> support, as no gnome specific functions are used. So, there's no
> advantage of calling gnome_init vs gtk_init. And from what I see, the
> gnome support has been several times mis-used by "precompiled distros"
> (forcing the instalation of gnome libs when they are not required at
> all).
>
> So, I ask if we can remove the gnome support from FvwmGtk.
I've been saying this for years -- yet no one would listen. I am in
favour of it.
Humm..
After a bit more dig up, it seems that "gnome support" is not just
that.. It's also the gnome wm hints support.. it may be important, as
this allows fvwm to integrate with gnome desktop (pagers and stuff).
yes, but only for gnome 1, so ...
But in what refers to FvwmGtk, it works exactly the same without gnome
support. The final question is, is it worth remove gnome support from
FvwmGtk if the rest of fvwm still needs it...
Not exactly (bug report system, if I remember some discussions on this
list). This known as, I am in favor of removing gnome support in FvwmGtk.
Olivier
