On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 09:16:24AM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, FVWM CVS wrote: > > >Log message: > >* Removed ifdefs from fifos.c. > >* Added a compat header file libs/fvwm_sys_stat.h to wrap stat.h compat > > issues. > > > > > > Is it really neccessary to defene everything with FVWM_ as a prefix? If > it's not already defined, why not define it using the expected name?
I use the "fvwm" prefix to document that we modified its meaning. If we had just #define O_NOFOLLOW 0 someone might rely ona that flag although it's just a dummy to make the compiler happy. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
