On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 12:30:34AM +0000, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 01:18:49AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > Is the NEWS file going to be used for 3.x releases too?  I always
> > found it easier to add new entries when patches are written
> > instead of reading the whole changelog when making a release.
> I now autogenerate this at release time via Github Actions, where the
> relevant bugs/pull-requests, etc., are pulled from Github and formatted
> accordingly in CHANGELOG.md
> > Can you give me an update on the intended release scheme?  Fvwm is
> > probably in an "unstable" phase at the moment?
> Right now, I've pre-scoped bugs/PRs/etc., which I feel should be in the 1.0.5
> release here:
> https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm3/projects/1?card_filter_query=milestone%3A1.0.5
> This is somewhat arbitrary on my part in that there's no real end-goal for a
> given release, other than what I think should be in it -- and typically what
> I've been doing is amassing changes and releasing when it feels right, even if
> items against that milestone might not yet have been finished.  In such cases,
> those items are moved forward to the next release.
> I don't think fvwm is in an "unstable" phase.  It seems to be "OK", although
> there's many rough edges still left to tidy up -- not helped by my own
> butchery of fvwm over the past year...

There probably needs to be some time when we annouce that we're
done removing stuff so that people know that future changes will
no longer break their configs.  I'd say the feature set is
unstable at the moment, not the code quality.


Dominik ^_^  ^_^


Dominik Vogt

Reply via email to