2009/9/17 Darren Upsolla <[email protected]>: > 1. i assume this text is official? i can't understand all of it. > - if it is official can i link to it from my website?
If you want. "Official" has no real meaning, other than the person who wrote it knew what they were talking about. So much so, the person in question forgot to mention the use of "fvwmstyle" but that's likely moot for all the reasons the post makes. > 2. i want to always start modules in startfunction - but why is fvwmbanner > special? Because that can show anything you like -- and generally people only like to see it once when they start FVWM up at init time -- a restart of FVWM is a deliberate act bu the user -- I suspect they still know FVWM is loading by that point. YMMV, it's an example only. > 3, i am to confused by the text in > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg16494.html - can it be > simplified? y by Microsoft. > http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/ Yes -- I can always create a version using glove puppets if it's easier. Other than that if you read it enough times, you might go quietly insane and somehow convert a load of KDE users -- or more likely you'll just go insane. I can hope. -- Thomas Adam
