hi!
On 13 June 2010 10:12, Thomas Adam <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:16:02PM +0100, Michael Treibton wrote:
>> hi everyone,
>
> Hello.
>
>> i've been reading with interest on this list for months that work is
>> being done to make fvwm-cvs stable.
>
> Since about 2003? Sure... :)
wowza - is it that long in reality? such a long time :)
> If you or *anyone* else wanted to actually help, by all means look at
> writing more purify tests -- that alone would likely throw up some
> interesting bugs if they were structured properly -- I have several ideas on
> how to improve these tests, so if anyone is seriously interested, do please
> ask me!
i wouldnt know the right place to start? how hard is it to do? can you
give an example?
> I hope that answers your question? Please note though -- and this is really
> important -- whilst I've generally used the first-person singular in this
> email ("I") -- there is more than one person here, I can only talk about the
> work I am doing though. :)
it does; thank you very much!
M. Treibton
