On 23/10/16 02:54, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 05:11:46PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>> > Yes, but that's actually not the part I was asking about. How the
>> > "git pull-request" should look like is not in the docs.
> OK. For that, you'd have to use their web interface. See:
>
> https://help.github.com/articles/about-pull-requests/
`git merge --no-ff ${BRANCH}` seems to be more-or-less equivalent.
Is there going to be some sort of naming and usage convention around
branches, e.g. like Git flow¹? Or is 'master' where the action happens?
--
Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL)
I haven't lost my mind...
...it's backed up on a tape somewhere.
1. http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
