On Thu 2020-09-03 20:14 , Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 12:13:45PM -0600, Jaimos Skriletz wrote:
[ ... stuff deleted ... ] > > Currently, I'm just gonna to go with fvwm3 conflicts with fvwm2 and > > only one of those can be installed at a time. > > I don't like this naming scheme that suggest the version number is > part of the project name. Is naming them "fvwm", "fvwm-2", > "fvwm-1" not an option? Such a naming scheme provides the user with an option to have multiple versions installed at once. Which does imho have certain practical value per se. In Fedora world, there are various exmaples of such approach, such as e.g. samba4, xmms2, or softwarecollections.org. I'm wondering whether there is a good reason not to go this way. m.
