Hello,
i am an icewm user, but took a look to fvwm now. It is very impressing what can be configured in fvwm. It seems that nearly everything is possible. But this also is my problem. I do not dare to try fvwm because it seems to be very much work to make it behave and look, like i want. (Also i have to think deeply about what i want it to look like. btw.: why are you using fvwm? What is the most important function/behaviour in fvwm for you?)
But why isn't there a good default-Look of fvwm that one can start with to experiment? I think many users who see fvwm for the first time say "looks like crap" and choose another window manager. IMHO fvwm could be a much more often used wm if it looked more friendly for a new user.
OK. Is there e.g. an icewm like configuration for the current stable fvwm version that i could try to start with?
Thank you,
Gert
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: FVWM: fvwm beautiful? Gert Brinkmann
- Re: FVWM: fvwm beautiful? Tenebrae
- Re: FVWM: fvwm beautiful? Gert Brinkmann
- Re: FVWM: fvwm beautiful? Dan Espen
- Re: FVWM: fvwm beautiful? Glyn Millington
- Re: FVWM: fvwm beautiful? ppi
- Re: FVWM: fvwm beautiful? Glyn Millington
- Re: FVWM: fvwm beautiful? Tenebrae
- Re: FVWM: fvwm beautiful? Rob Park
- Re: FVWM: fvwm beautiful? Gert Brinkmann
- Re: FVWM: fvwm beautiful? Dominik Vogt
