On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 08:32:51AM -0500, Mark Krenz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 11:29:29AM +1100, Cameron Simpson said the following: > > > > With FVWM's opaque move the window sees all the intermediate positions and > > does nots of redrawing if it's transparent. > > > > I think that it would be better if fvwm just kept the current state of > the window in memory without trying to update it until you released the > window. After all, you do an opaque move just so you can see what the > whole window will look like in it's new place, not so that you can move > the window around while watching it update. Can a new option be added > to OpaqueMoveSize called 'nice', or something like that?
Yeah, just turn opaque move off if you don't like it. That's what wire frame move is for ;-) Seriously, there is no reliable ways to find out the window contents to make a copy of the window that is moved around. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
