On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 06:40:29PM +0100, Gert Brinkmann wrote: > > Thanks for your explanation, Dominik. > > phew... complicated... What does "obscure" mean in window manager > context?
Being covered by other windows or outside the screen area so that not a single pixel can be seen. > Checking a dictionary did not return sensefull results. You need a better dictionary :-) > So, > what is the difference between "not (fully) visible" and "(partially) > obscured"? Fully visible = all pixels are displayed Fully obscured = no pixel is visible Partially obscured = some pixels are visible and some are not > All the cases that you did describe are ok to send such an event, but > none of these cover the situation i did mean: When moving the > pager-screen around with at everytime completely *not* showing the page > where mozilla is opened, mozilla should not get such an event, isn't it? Right. > Only if a mozilla window was not (fully) visible and at one time becomes > more visible than before, it needs to redraw and so requires such an > event, as i understand. Yes. Expose events inform a window of newly visible areas. > But Dan allready said that this might be fixed sometime. It is certainly > of priority C, IMO. (The only thing is that this > mouse-button-3-scrolling in the pager did arouse my interest for fvwm, > because it gave me a totally new feeling of a real huge virtual screen. > But there are enough other interesting things to be found in fvwm...) Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
