On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 00:30:34 +0200 Klaus Umbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 11:41:00PM +0200, martin sepulveda wrote: > > for many years i've used (and still use) borderless windows only. > > well, borders for active windows are usefull to resize them manualy (if > usefull - normaly fvwm does that for me) i have this three buttons on my titlebars Mouse 0 2 A Function "window_ops_func" Mouse 0 4 A Resize Mouse 0 6 A Iconify but from time to time i remove them and get window_ops_func from right-clicking on the titlebar, so i can resize windows without using handles or borders at all. and pretty used to middle-clicking on the background and using the window ops menu to raise or resize windows anyway. > > some (terminals and such -- rxvt or dzt) have a titlebar, while > > what is dzt? a tabed gtk terminal emulator. i administer clusters of application servers and oracle servers, and i need to log in on 15+ machines, but the sight of 15 rxvt side to side get me nervous... two dzt windows get me going nicely. > > things like procmeter3 (several remote) and the like get moved around > > from the WindowOps menu. > > uglyness is in the eye of the beholder, and usability is on the hand > > of the user... and i hate getting a 3200x1200 display (xinerama) just > > I don't like xinerama, because switching the pages switches them on all > screens, which I don't like. Dualhead is much cooler, I even can use > different windowmanagers if I want to. I don't need to move windows from > one screen to the other. i used dual heads before, but a combination of sticky windows and fvwmmodules with xinerama is what i prefer now. and from time to time i stretch a window across the screens, specially big database diagrams and such. m. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
