Op 21 Aug 2003 (12:47), schreef Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 21 Aug 2003 10:01:23 +0200, Jules Alberts wrote: > > The tree-like look of menu-submenu-submenu allows me to allways see > > where I'm coming from. A submenu title is in this case redundant. And > > it also costs time. I call the menu with a keyboard shortcut. When I > > [arrow] into the submenu of my choice, I have to do an extra [down- > > arrow] to get onto something useful. That's ons keystroke extra for > > each time I enter a submenu. And when I press enter by mistake on a > > submenu name, I get an xterm in the dir of that submenu. > > > > No, I would really like to get rid of the titles :-) > > Ok, in the next versions (2.4.17 and 2.5.8) two things will be added. If > you specify --command-title "" then the title item is not choosable like > any normal menu Title; and if you specify --title "" then the title is > removed completely. Any of these should solve your keyboard navigation.
Wow, I don't know what to say... Thanks!! I think more people will like this option. > > If I use your piperead as-is, all my menu-entries (which are softlinks > > to programs) are opened with vim. Also, sub-sub-menus (since > > FvwmMenuDirectory works recursively -which is really nice-) still get > > a title. > > It should work, I can't say why it does not work for you without seeing > the exact configuration. Try to run this PipeRead command from the > shell. OK, I will experiment with it, see what it does. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
