On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:57:17 +0200 Bernard Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 11:07:05AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 01:32:53AM +0100, Ukpong Ukpong wrote: > > > Hi all I am doing a projects using a fvwm and need to know the > > > most stable fvwm version in the 2.5.x series to use. > > > > If you need a stable version, use the latest 2.4.x release. None > > of the 2.5.x releases can be called stable. > > and in what time frame, very approximately, is a stable release > (version 2.6.x I guess) of 2.5 to be expected ? > ... or is it intended only for hackers, but not for normal users ? I'm no hacker and I use fvwm 2.5.8(cvs) on my work PC, where I can't afford hours of downtime to mess with my wm (my boss will get agitated :). I don't have any problems with it, and the transparency support makes it a must IMHO. -- Stuart Logie Programmer UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SERVICES (PTY) LTD A member of South Africa's largest retail software vendor, the UCS Group Tel : (011) 712 1371 Cell : 082 902 5632 Fax : (011) 339 3421 Internet : http://ucs.co.za "I am the Unconquerable Spirit." -- Poet Unknown Powered by Debian GNU/Linux - testing/unstable
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
