On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 12:36:55PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > On 12 May 2004 08:25:48 -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote: > > > > except that FvwmButtons is not honoring the -g specification > > 144x96+$[pointer.x]+$[pointer.y]. Size alone is honored, size+position > > is honored if the position is a fixed specification, but the > > pointer-position specification does not work. What is the first fvwm2 > > version in which the $[pointer.x] notation should be valid? I'm running > > 2.4.16 at present. > > 2.5.1, you may read NEWS file on the web to get such info.
OK, looks like I now have a reason to move to 2.5. -- .********* Fight Back! It may not be just YOUR life at risk. *********. : phil stracchino : unix ronin : renaissance man : mystic zen biker geek : : [EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] : : 2000 CBR929RR, 1991 VFR750F3 (foully murdered), 1986 VF500F (sold) : : Linux Now! ...Because friends don't let friends use Microsoft. : -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
