Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 29 May 2002 14:47:30 +0200, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 29 May 2002, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:01:09PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > > > If fvwm3 were to be released for a date in the future,
> > > > Dominik, would you consider some kind of "graphical"
> > > > customisation tool, similar to what Enlightenment
> > > > offers???
> 
> There were tries to add such tool into FVWM, but not very successful.
> Try for example to run a nice small "FvwmScript FvwmScript-BaseConfig".
> Maybe this is because not many FVWM users need such tool? I think the
> real reason is that any graphic tool is very limited by its definition.

I agree that FVWM should always expect vi (or Emacs) to
be the configuration tool of choice.  There are so many things a
gui can't anticipate.

I guess I should have known about "FvwmScript FvwmScript-BaseConfig",
maybe I've seen it before but I forgot about it.  I'll have
to add it to my menus.
Maybe we should do more work on the FVWM built-in menu.
(Like add this tool to it.)

FVWM does have some GUI configuration already, its just
not very visible.

-- 
Dan Espen                           E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
444 Hoes Lane  Room RRC 1C-214      Phone: (732) 699-5570
Piscataway, NJ 08854
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to