On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 11:05:06PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 05 Aug 2002 00:39:55 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> > > It seems that the program is compiled, but returns a non zero.
> >
> > Note: If it has compiled, there must be an explanation in thei
> > configure summary. If there was no explanation, then the program
> > was not successfully compiled or not started.
>
> Sorry, this is not correct. The helpful explanation is always printed
> regardless of the failed stage. Since there is no such answer as "NO", but
> "no: explanation", it is clear that Sigmund just did not write it down.
But it *is* correct. If compilation fails, you don't get an
explanation:
[edit configure.in, add a syntax error in the C code]
$ grep --before-context=1 --after-context=4 "#error" configure.in
AC_TRY_RUN([#include <X11/xpm.h>
--> #error
int main(int c, char **v) {
return c == 1 ? 0 :
XpmIncludeVersion != XpmLibraryVersion() ? 1 :
XpmIncludeVersion < 30407 ? 2 : 0 ;}],
$ autoreconf > /dev/null && ./configure | grep "With XPM"
--> With XPM image support? no
^^^^
Bye
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
