Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > Fixing all the copies of Tk out there is also not really an option. > > Anyway, we can't go about introducing bug after bug in fvwm just > to cope with Tk which is totally broken in many aspects of window
Why would it be a bug in fvwm ? > > In > > this I would argue that the principle similar to IETF's "adhere to the > > standards as closely as possible in your outputs but accept as wide variety > > of inputs as possible" should apply to the window managers as well. And > > seeing the focus change on mouse movement while I specifically selected > > the focus mode that disables that looks wrong too. > > The standard is that the WM can do with the focus whatever it > likes if the application fails to use the WM_TAKES_FOCUS protocol. Correct. And it would be nice if it liked to handle even those applications gratiously. > > Basically, what I would like to know is whether this happened occasionally > > or was done by design ? If it was done occasionally, I may be able > > to find out the reason and provide a fix. If it was done by design, > > I suppose the fvwm project would not be interested in this fix. > > It's not a fix because nothing is broken except the application. What if we call it a "feature" ? -SB -- Sergey Babkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Escalations Research Group, Caldera - NJ (908)790-2385 -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
