On 23 Aug 2002 17:14:55 +0200, szonyi calin wrote: > > > 2. I use locale ro_RO.ISO-8859-16. > > I think the locale for Romania should be > ro_RO.ISO-8859-2. > Is there any reason for using ro_RO.ISO-8859-16 ?
It includes the euro sign and some other small changes AFAIK. I suppose fvwm-2.4.x exits when it does not find fixed *-iso8859-16 font. By the way these patches to replace searching for strictly "fixed" font were demanded by the Debian maintainer, I think he included these or similar patches before creating debs anyway. I hoped he or someone else will reply to other Debian specific questions asked in this thread. I don't have ro_RO.ISO-8859-16 locale on my system to test anything. Anyway the solution should be to use fonts existing in your locale or explicitely specify charset (like *-fixed-*-iso8859-2) when defining fonts, or switch to 2.5.x where i18n and font handling is much improved. But prepare to get warnings if the used fonts do not match your locale. Regards, Mikhael. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
