On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 02:40:13PM +0200, Rastislav Galia wrote: > > What I have in mind is a release that we can point at that isn't > > two years old. I am planning to spend less time before the 2.6 > > release anyway. I will definitely not push it if it isn't > > stabilizing fast enough. > > Does spending less time mean fvwm development if canceled ?
No, I was comparing the time between 2.2 and 2.4 (2.5 years) with the time between 2.4 and 2.6 (hopefully < 2 years). It means that 2.4 development got out of hand and that I want to retain better control over release dates. 2.3.x was in feature freeze for about a year. That must not happen again. > And - I thought 2.6 will be stable version final 2.5 unstable. Yes. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], phone: 0721/91374-382 Schlund + Partner AG, Erbprinzenstr. 4-12, D-76133 Karlsruhe -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
