On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, martin sepulveda wrote:
> i hate to say the obvious, but fvwm is not great, it's the best wm around.
>
> if there were plenty of config files i doubt anyone would be using any
> other (bloated) wms.
Actually, I think it'd be more like "if there were a graphical
configuration client available i doubt anyone would be using any other
(bloated) wms." At this point, I think that's all that's really keeping
FVWM from the (now) popular gnome/kde crowd.
-peace
--
Let he who is without clue kiss my ass
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
