On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 11:41:00PM +0200, martin sepulveda wrote: > for many years i've used (and still use) borderless windows only.
well, borders for active windows are usefull to resize them manualy (if usefull - normaly fvwm does that for me) > some (terminals and such -- rxvt or dzt) have a titlebar, while what is dzt? > things like procmeter3 (several remote) and the like get moved around > from the WindowOps menu. > uglyness is in the eye of the beholder, and usability is on the hand > of the user... and i hate getting a 3200x1200 display (xinerama) just I don't like xinerama, because switching the pages switches them on all screens, which I don't like. Dualhead is much cooler, I even can use different windowmanagers if I want to. I don't need to move windows from one screen to the other. > to waste it on borders i don't need or like. > > m. > > On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 22:01:37 +0200 > Klaus Umbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 07:15:14PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > > > On 30 Mar 2003 20:42:20 +0200, Klaus Umbach wrote: > > > > > > > > My problem today is, that I want no borders for the inactive windows to > > > > save more space on my desktop. > > > > > > I think windows without any border look ugly, but it is up to you. > > > > > I don't think it's ugly, you can look at a screenshot: > > http://doppelhertz.homelinux.org/screenshot.jpg > > Unfortunately you cannot see my transparent, colored and animated > > mousecursor (xfree4.3) :-) > > <...> -- 5) People say Linux is ugly. How does that make you feel? Torvalds: They'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes. Let's see just how ugly they think it is when they have a few bulletholes in them. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
