On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 12:44:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 03:14:36PM +0100, Ukpong Ukpong wrote:
> > This my point exactily there is no use it using 2.4 doesn't have enought
> > features yet users are encouraged to use it beacause it is "stabel." If
> > there was a faster stable release cycle that would solve the problem.
>
> Yes, sure. Everybody is welcome to help in getting the 2.6
> release out the door. Please remember that we are all volunteers
> spending our free time on fvwm.
we do realize that, and I personally feel awkward when I ask.
The idea is that maybe a little gentle pressure from friends (we
would not even bother if we were not friends) may help draw a line and
get a version out.
I am blind on the current state of FVWM. But if, as many seem to
think, there is much more functionality in 2.5.10 than in 2.4, it could
be a good idea to decide to have something out as stable version.
Especially since there are comments that it is fairly reliable.
Or are there reasons I cannot guess not to do it ? maybe 2.5
functionnality is behind that of 2.4 in some areas ? Sorry to be naive
on these issues.
with all due respect to your work
cordialement
Bernard
who is totally incompetent to help in these matters.
--
Non aux Brevets Logiciels - No to Software Patents
SIGNEZ http://petition.eurolinux.org/ SIGN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ,_ /\o \o/ Tel +33 1 3963 5644
http://pauillac.inria.fr/~lang/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Fax +33 1 3963 5469
INRIA / B.P. 105 / 78153 Le Chesnay CEDEX / France
Je n'exprime que mon opinion - I express only my opinion
CAGED BEHIND WINDOWS or FREE WITH LINUX
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
