Am 2007-05-04 20:26:08, schrieb Hans Voss: > I would go for PNG because of it being newer and I believe that it > also supports transparancy (and XPM did not).
XPM is supporting pransparency ;-)
/* XPM */
static char * 31x31_mutt_xpm[] = {
"32 32 121 2",
" c None",
". c #282728",
"+ c #121112",
"@ c #000000",
"# c #C7C3C7",
"$ c #767476",
"% c #504E50",
"None" is transparency
> However PNG is not necessarily compiled into every FVWM out there...
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
