On 02/10/2007, Chris G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 10:21:20PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 10:10:18PM +0100, Chris G wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 10:47:19PM +0200, Jes?s Guerrero wrote: > > > > On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 22:41:56 +0200 > > > > Jes?s Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > exec >$HOME/.xsession.$DISPLAY > > > > > > > > Ok, forget my comment about that exec line. It is a redirector. I > > > > didn't even read > > > > it, it was my fault. Still, the rest of things I said are valid. Your > > > > xinitrc is > > > > strange. > > > > > > > Not to mention that if the system is set to run at run level 5 (which > > > tends to be the default nowadays) it won't even look at .initrc. > > > > Umm, this depends entirely on the distribution. Debian, for instance > > doesn't distinguish between what's started in runlevels 2->5 inclusive, > > they're essentially all the same. > > > OK, it's the scripts 'underneath' xdm/kdm/wdm/gdm. The distributions > I have played with have all ignored the .xinitrc when at run level 5. > > Whatever, depending on distribution, there's a fair chance that > .xinitrc isn't being looked at.
http://fvwmwiki.bu-web.de/HashFvwmIrcFaq?highlight=%28CategoryIRC%29#head-5fd61e65135d57c37be671b7cf0970711e6cb591 -- Thomas Adam
