Speaking of... sorry for mailing you off list - hit the wrong key. On 2009-10-06 (Tue) 19:25:44 [-0400], [email protected] wrote: > J <[email protected]> writes: > > > On 2009-10-06 (Tue) 19:59:26 [+0100], Thomas Adam wrote: > >> 2009/10/6 Jamie Griffin <[email protected]>: > >> > Hello > >> > > >> > I'm using fvwm 2.4.20 on OpenBSD 4.5. > >> > >> Please compile up FVWM 2.5.28 -- not that it will make any difference > >> to your problem, but you'll appreciate the benefits for things like > >> EWMH, Colorsets, etc. > >> > > > > Please support 2.4.x or release 2.6.0. With the latter, *everyone* will > > be able to appreciate the benefits of a new *stable* fvwm that systems > > like OpenBSD and Slackware would be able to ship. > > 2.5.x is stable regardless of what you may have read.
I know - I've been using it for years without problems. But it's not "officially" stable so those who don't replace their distro's fvwm with one they've compiled for themselves miss out. But I don't blame distro's for not shipping something the developers won't call stable and I don't blame users being uneasy with overriding their distro. So people keep asking for help with 2.4.x and keep getting told to upgrade to 2.5.x and this has been going on for years.
