sets of interfaces participating in vrrp must be on the same network, vrrp can 
have no hops between these interfaces,




________________________________
From: Peter Addy <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, October 18, 2010 12:49:21 PM
Subject: Re: [FW-1] IP addressing of firewalls and cluster topology

Hi,
Does anyone of any thoughts on this, any help is appreciated
Thanks

On Sun Oct 17th, 2010 8:25 PM BST Peter Addy wrote:

>i was thinking would it be easier to assign the cluster memebers the same 
>network and this will have a vrrp address, sp change the hostname ip to the 
>new 
>addresss, keeping the hostname as it is.
>the ip i mentioned will still rbe the management ip's therefoe can simply 
>manage 
>the firewalls on those ip's ssh, https etc, so in dns have the hostnames 
>resolve 
>to the 172.22.28.29 an 172.21.28.29
>
>Hope this makes sense
>
>--- On Sun, 17/10/10, Peter Addy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>From: Peter Addy <[email protected]>
>Subject: [FW-1] IP addressing of firewalls and cluster topology
>To: [email protected]
>Date: Sunday, 17 October, 2010, 20:05
>
>Hi,
>
>Does anyone know of any issues where two firewall modules(cluster 
>members)which 
>have differnt iP's that are in a Checkpint Nokia VRRP cluster?
>
>Scenario, one module is assigned for example 172.22.28.29, the other module is 
>172.21.28.29, these modules are also managed IP's, that is we will conect to 
>these  models on ssh and https etc, and the hostname are those IP's, the 
>cluster 
>IP is a 147.x.x.x
>
>There is no cluster for the modules as they are not on the same network.
>The toplogy looks strange in the fact that it does not run contiguous, so 
>looking at the topo of the checkpoint cluster we have one interface on each 
>module, no vrrp, same interface though, eth1c0
>
>i know there will no vrrp for this and cpha status should be fine as long as 
>we 
>have the synch, so active/active should be seen, or will this cause an issue?
>
>Can anyone see an issue with this config, or should the cluster members have 
>to 
>be on the same network?
>
>
>Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>=================================================
>To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>send an email to [email protected]
>in the BODY of the email add:
>set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>=================================================
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>please see the instructions at
>http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>=================================================
>If you have any questions on how to change your
>subscription options, email
>[email protected]
>=================================================
>
>
>
>      


      

Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.

=================================================
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to [email protected]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[email protected]
=================================================






Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.


=================================================
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to [email protected]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[email protected]
=================================================

Reply via email to