Hi Mark,

        You can use Alteon ACEDirector to balance load on serveral FW. It 
doesn't mind want kind of S.O. Or hardware you use. This will be a 
hardware solution. They have many problems to solve but in general it 
works.

        Kind regards.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mensaje original <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

El 5/19/00, 5:55:06 AM, "Mark Ingles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
escribi� sobre el tema [FW1] Linux load balancing:


> I'm looking for load balancing software/hardware for two Linux 
firewalls.
> This will eventually become 3 or 4 when I get more bandwidth. I saw 
that
> StoneBeat supports Linux, but Rainwall doesn't...
> As for hardware, I saw demos of Radware and Foundry in March at the
> Checkpoint User's Group, but don't know of any others. I realize the
> hardware doesn't care what OS the firewall is running, I just don't 
know
> too much about it.
> Does anyone have any experiences, good or bad, with Linux and load
> balancing? I just looked through a ton of messages in my list archives 
and
> Nokia, Solaris, and NT, but I didn't see anything specific to Linux.
> I currently have about 15 megs of bandwidth, and will be adding about 
100
> more in the next few months. In theory, the total bandwidth could 
reach
> about 320 mbit within the next year, but I doubt it. However, I do 
need to
> account for it in my plans. That is why I would like to know more 
about the
> hardware options.
> I do use NAT, but no VPNs, if that matters.

> Thanks in advance,
> Mark Ingles




> 
=======================================================================
=========
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the 
instructions at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> 
=======================================================================
=========





================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Reply via email to