We use an Ultra 5 for a management server for 2 Ultra 60 firewalls.  No
problem.  As far as the logs, yes they would be stored on the Ultra 5.
However we move them to a log server.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marty Saletta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 4:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [FW1] Sun hardware recommendations?
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   I'm looking for anyone that can provide
> what they think are the *real* min/optimal
> requirements for running FW-1 version 4.1
> on a Sun.  The manual doesn't really get
> specific enough as far as CPU speed and
> the such.
> 
>   I'm looking to protect maybe 100-200 hosts.
> Right now I'm running a single Ultra-60
> with 256MB RAM.  We're not doing NAT or VPN
> yet, but I wouldn't want to rule that out.
> 
>   We're looking to get an HA/load balancing
> solution (that's another subject), but I'm really
> just looking for the Sun hardware at this point.
> 
>   I'd like to set up three Suns: two to do the
> FW work and a third one to be the management
> station.
> 
>   Would an Ultra 10 work ok for the other FW and
> perhaps a small Ultra 5 be enough for just
> the management station duties?  Where will the
> log files be stored- the management station?
> 
>   Thanks-
>   Marty
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Marty Saletta, System Administrator, Raytheon ITSS Corporation
> NASA Center for Computational Sciences
> Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ==============================================================
> ==================
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the 
> instructions at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ==============================================================
> ==================
> 


================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Reply via email to