You would prefer a Nokia solution in any situation
where cost, stability, reliabiliy, ease of
configuration, management and security are a
consideration.
--- "Mayne, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Assume I want to install a highly available
> firewall. The two options under
> consideration are a pair of Nokia systems using
> VRRP, and a pair of Windows
> NT systems with the CheckPoint HA module. A Solaris
> or other UNIX solution
> isn't being considered because an NT shop doesn't
> want to learn how to
> manage a Solaris system, whereas a Nokia can
> presumably be treated like a
> black box.
>
> Cost aside (since the Nokia solution seems to be
> cheaper), what are the pros
> and cons of one vs the other? Under what
> circumstances (if any) would I
> prefer a particular Nokia or NT solution?
>
>
> PJDM
> ----
> Peter Mayne, Compaq Computer Australia, Canberra,
> ACT
> These are my opinions, and have nothing to do with
> Compaq.
> Never express yourself more clearly than you are
> able to think. - Niels Bohr
>
>
>
>
================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please
> see the instructions at
>
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>
================================================================================
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints!
http://photos.yahoo.com
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
