So...does Rainwall utilize the Checkpoint state table
syncronization or not?? Just curious...-BK
On 15 Jun 2000, at 23:40, Cisco Wave wrote:
>
> Dear Ven Kidambi, Chris, James, Brian,
>
> Thank you very much for your email and help. I did
> receive support from Rainfinity directly. And the
> issue is related to the enhancedFWSync option for
> Rainwall.
>
> I am really happy of the support provided by Rainwall.
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ven Kidambi [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2000 8:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Do you need help?
>
> Dear Cisco Wave,
>
> We have noticed that you posted a question concerning
> firewall state
> synchronization on the Firewall-1 mailing lists.
> Although your question
> has been answered, we want to make sure we follow-up
> with you to see if
> you need help.
> In your message you have mentioned that you have
> inherited Rainwall and
> don't have any knowledge of your support contract. If
> you can please
> send your company information and any other
> information that can help us
> to track your support contract, we will gladly do that
> for you.
>
> Sincerely,
> Ven Kidambi
> Manager, Technical Support Rainfinity.
> << File: Card for Ven Kidambi >>
>
>
>
> =====
> We are NOT Cisco Inc.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send instant messages with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com/
>
>
> ================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ================================================================================
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
