Tracy,

Have you verified what you see in the logs with an actual sniff trace? 
I ran into a similar problem about a year ago (can't remember the exact
specifics) where the logs showed the first octet being a 100 (instead of
a 10), but doing a sniff trace showed that the traffic was truly being
NATted correctly.  So it was more of a logging bug than anything else. 
Also, I notice that you're only at SP1.  I would definitely go to SP5 in
any case.....  Hope this helps!

Jason

Maxi Tracy A Contr AFRL/SNOO wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> I have a strange problem which is probably a config issue but I can't find
> it for the life of me...  Thought maybe someone might give me some pointers
> on things to verify or, who knows, maybe there's a patch for it!
> 
> Anyway, I am running Firewall-1 V4.0 Build 4031 on Solaris 2.6.  I moved my
> v3.0b databases over (from a Solaris 2.5 box) and started a new.  I am
> currently in test phase and here is the problem.
> 
> The first octet of the IP address does not get translated correctly in
> certain instances.  This happens (in the same circumstances) with either my
> hide NAT for my internal network or when doing a static NAT for an IP.  It
> seems to happen when I do a PING from an internal system (ie: 10.1.2.3 NAT
> is y.y.y.y) to an external IP (x.x.x.x).  The ping works fine but in the log
> file I have the following:
> 
> interface               source          destination     proto   xlated
> source          xlated destination
> ge0 (internal)          10.1.2.3                x.x.x.x         icmp
> 6.y.y.y                 x.x.x.x
> hme0 (external)         x.x.x.x         10.1.2.3                icmp
> 1.x.x.x                 y.y.y.y
> 
> If my hide NAT is y.y.y.y is always makes the first octet a 6 yet if I run
> my browser or do an ftp to a site on the internet, the 'xlated source' IP
> address is correct.
> 
> I have checked the settings of my NICs (ifconfig), my routing (netstat), my
> arp (arp), my hosts, and my Firewalled object...
> 
> I have changed my network config a lot to fit the testing environment but I
> have gone over the settings with a fine tooth comb and all appears correct.
> Anybody have any ideas?
> 
> Thanks for your help in advance.  Please let me know what other data I can
> provide that would be helpful in troubleshooting this.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tracy A. Maxi
> Firewall Administrator
> AFRL/SNOO Computer Operations
> Compaq Computers
> (937) 255-1953 x3536
> 
> ================================================================================
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ================================================================================


================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Reply via email to