>I beg to differ. When it comes to security, the theory that you should
>stick with what you know is easy to prove false.
>
>The number of people that can install an NT Server with IIS is far
>larger than the number of people who can install OpenBSD. Still, the
>number of break-ins is also much larger for WinNT.
I've to agree with you with another point:
If you try to install OpenBSD, you will see some concepts that you
may be not familiar with. I mean, you see "labels" and "partitions"
and such kind of things, and you must have some kind of knowledge
if you want to do thigs in the right way.
You can always just press ENTER, ENTER, ENTER. but that's not Windows.
remember it... :-)
The price of Windows' "easy-to-use"(?) is security. In the other hand,
you must have it if you want to get a full deployment of all things
OpenBSD can offer you...
Anyway, default ENTER, ENTER, ENTER installation is pretty secure. :-)
Regards.
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
