Ash,
1. On the fw modules.
2a. It could choke the line, depending on how
much logging is going on.
2b. Yes. You may place as many entries in the
$FWDIR/conf/loggers file, which specify the IP
addresses of each management station to receive
log entries. If this file is empty, then it will default to
system that the modules in running on(itself).
The system will sequentially try each entry until it
connects. If you preceed the entry with a '+', then
it will direct log entries to all of these systems. It
will direct to all '+' systems if it can connect. If
it can't it will try each of the non '+' systems
until it succeeds.
3. Yes, to the best of my knowledge.
hth,
Robert
- -
Robert P. MacDonald, Network Engineer
e-Business Infrastructure
G o r d o n F o o d S e r v i c e
Voice: +1.616.261.7987 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "Ash's Yahoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2/11/00 4:50:05 AM >>>
>Hello Gurus,
> We have got 3 offices and are planning to establish a VPN between them.The 2
>locations will have
>FW Module and the headoffice will have FW Module + Management Console.
>Now, the issue
> 1.Where will the logs will be generated ?
> 2. If it is in the HO only where the management Console then it will choke the HO
>bandwidth ,Is there is
>any way that the logs of respective FW Modules be placed at their respective ends
>only ?
>3. Since HO is the largest network ,we are planning to have Bandwidth Management
>(FLOODGATE ) for
>that also there. Is it possible to have Floodgate at HO and not on the Other 2
>locations and manage
>everthing with the Single management console.
>(OfCourse it will do the bandwidth management for HO only).
>
>Hope to get too many solutions and suggestions.
>
>
>Cheers,
>Ash
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================