Sorry about the subject.

Forgot to mention, I'm running 4.1 sp2 on gui, fw and manager.
Also, I am static natting at the firewall and the drops are for the real
address, the decrypt occurs on the private address.

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Tucker, Greg
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 5:11 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [FW1] fw confmerge



I'm trying to implement Secure Client.

I have a test machine in the DMZ that I have a rule to allow HTTP to with
Encrypted Client.
I'm getting authenticated.
I get a decrypt log entry for FW1_pslogon.
I get a decrypt log entry for http,
then I have three log entries dropping http.
The page finally times out.

Anybody have any ideas?


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Baskar Pathmanathan
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 3:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FW1] fw confmerge



Hey folks,

Does anyone know what the following error mears.  Having problems trying to
merge a 4.0 with 4.1 objects.C files.

thanks
baskar

# fw confmerge obj-new.C obj-old.C > objects.C
>: Syntax Errorne 3: ERROR: Bad format at name <


============================================================================
====
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
============================================================================
====


============================================================================
====
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
============================================================================
====


================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Reply via email to