After doing a major revamp of my firewall rulebase, I was having problems
having
my internal DNS server resolve some names.  I ran Sniffer on the segment
between
the firewall and our ISP's router, and was amazed to see the internal source
address of the DNS server being used!  Since our internal network uses
RFC1918
reserved addresses, I had defined static NAT entries for the DNS servers.
Even
more interesting is the fact that sometimes the firewall DID translate!

For example, we set up the NAT rules as follows:

        Original Packet                   Translated Packet
Source    Destination   Service   Source     Destination   Service
Install On
DNS-int   Any           Any       DNS-ext    Original      Original   FW-Svr
Any       DNS-ext       Any       Original   DNS-int       Original   FW-Svr

What was interesting was:

1. Packets from DNS-int to our ISP's DNS servers did not have the source
address
   translated.  The sniffer saw the source as DNS-int.
2. Packets from DNS-int to other DNS servers did have the source address
   translated.  The sniffer saw the source as DNS-ext.
3. Another internal DNS server always translated, no matter which
destination
   DNS servers it was trying to access!

Later the same day (with no firewall reloads), the problem mysteriously went
away!

We are currently running FW-1 4.0 SP2 on NT 4.0 SP6a.  Has anyone
experienced
anything like this, and can explain what may have been happening?  I cannot
determine how FW-1 would sometimes translate and sometimes not, depending on
the
destination, when the only NAT rules I have applying to the internal server
say
"Any" for a destination.

In short, I'm okay now, but I want to understand what happened, so I can
prevent
it from happening again.  Thanks in advance.

Ray Lodato
NEF Information Services
617-578-3197
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Reply via email to