Hi,
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 2:53 PM
> Subject: RE: [FW1] Why choose Nokia? Here's why.
>
> <snip>
>> However, he was somewhat misleading in his comparison of Stonebeat to
>> Nokia's.
> <snip>
>
>Can you extrapolate on that?
Sure.
I meant that there's a difference between comparing the StoneBeat HA solution -
which is very similar to Nokia with hot-standby or load-sharing configurations,
basic two-node failover support, etc. - and having a comparison with StoneBeat
FullCluster, which, unlike the Nokia platform, performs dynamic load-balancing,
scales up to 16 nodes per cluster, and operates with your choice of Solaris, NT
or Linux. I just wanted it to be clear that Stonesoft offers two solutions for
achieving HA with Check Point boxes.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Boltz Stonesoft, Inc.
Network Security Specialist 115 Perimeter Center Place
[EMAIL PROTECTED] South Terraces, Suite 1000
Tel: +1 770 668 1125 Atlanta, GA 30346
Cel: +1 404 386 8500 USA
Fax: +1 770 668 1131 http://www.stonesoft.com
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
