Ummm I really think you should stick with trying to get the CheckPoint VPNS
working.. I ceratinly wouldnt recommend Nortel Contivity over CheckPoints
solution.. This is like comparing a Ferrari to a VW beetle.

Frank


-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Brandt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 3:13 PM
To: Vestelind, Monika
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [FW1] VPN solution for my company



Nortel has a nice VPN cm...lient solution called the Contivity.

Bob Brandt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Vestelind, Monika" wrote:

> Hi!
> We are looking for a good VPN solution for our company.
> We have only one CP firewall against Internet and the idea is
> to let people reach internal resources from Internet.
> We started with evaluation of VPN-1 gate with SecuRemote, but
> it doesn�t work properly and checkpoint support is just catastrophic.
> Unfortunetely...though I think that the product might be good.
>
> My question is - does anyone have another solution for external clients
VPN,
> I mean Internet people <---> protected net.
>
> Any good products, experiences, recommendations?
>
> Thanks in advance
> Monika
>
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
============================================================================
====
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>
============================================================================
====



============================================================================
====
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
============================================================================
====


================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Reply via email to