Re: [FW1] Opinon Requested - to NAT or not to NAT DMZ Addresses

[CryptoTech]

Speed.  Firewall load.  Latency.  NAT modifies every packet involved in the rule, and thus add latency.  If you are running 100mb or higher, you probably don't want to use nat HTH, CryptoTech Brian Burns wrote: I am doing a redesign of our existing network and have been asked to use private addressing with NAT. I am not pro/against it - but I have always used valid addresses on my DMZ servers. So... why would one want to use NAT on your DMZ devices? Comments? Brian