Should not be a problem if you subnet mask is 255.255.0.0 or 255.255.255.0.
But not Class A.
They would be on the same network and your redirector would not send it to a
remote network. Therefore bypassing SR.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kelly, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Fw-1-Mailinglist (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 11:53 AM
Subject: [FW1] SecuRemote
>
> I can't seem to find anything on SR and routing. I remember
> hearing/reading
> somewhere of problems using SR if your client and server both use NAT
> and
> the private networks are similiar. My SR client local net is 10.130.1.0
> (all
> our networks are of the 10.x.x.x range) and my client is statically NATd
> to
> 63.69.x.82. I am using FWZ for encryption and can connect to the
> Firewall-1
> and retreive a key. However the resources I want to connect to are on a
> 10.16.7.0 network behind the firewall and I cannot connect to those
> resources. The SR icon stays idle in the taskbar, so it looks like SR is
> not
> processing any packets.
>
>
> ========================================================================
> ========
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions
> at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ========================================================================
> ========
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
