I would say that the test setup is a bit unfair.
After looking at the graphs, almost noone bothers to check the hardware and
software configuration of the machines that participated in the test.
As a matter of fact, they have almost nothing in common in terms of
processing power, patch levels, etc..
http://www.checkpoint.com/products/firewall-1/pbrief.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Marius .R. Banica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 10:33 AM
To: Hartmann, Josef; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [FW1] NT vs Unix as FW platform
Hi there,
This is A thrughput by checkpoint
http://www.checkpoint.com/products/vpn1/vpn1perfdata.html
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hartmann, Josef" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 10:15 AM
Subject: [FW1] NT vs Unix as FW platform
>
> Hi,
>
> does anybody have good links/ documents about a comparison of running a
> firewall rather on a Unix OS than NT or the other way around?
>
> Cheers,
>
> JH
>
>
>
============================================================================
====
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>
============================================================================
====
>
============================================================================
====
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
============================================================================
====
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
