After reading this it is clear the reviewer has not done his homework. This
is why I HATE so many product reviews, the reviewer does not put forth the
effort to properly review the products. Unfortunately, many people take
these reviews as fact. In the case of this review, there are severe flaws,
pointless points, and generally wrong statements.. We do in house testing
for theis very reason. Dont believe everything you read. I could pick this
thing apart line by line, and I might if I get some time. True, I am a FW-1
bigot, but I am not neccesarily religious about anything. CP has its flaws,
suprisingly I did not really see any of them listed here..
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 5:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FW1] PIX vs. CheckPoint
This document was posted in the Cisco Study group. It was inferred this was
an unbiased objective view.
I would be interested in this groups comments.
http://www.roble.com/docs/fw1_or_pix.html
============================================================================
====
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
============================================================================
====
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
