Andre,
We just recently changed from SecuRemote to Secure Client. Yes, we did have to pay
for a license. However, we can now push security policies down to the user's desktop
and require that the policy is confirmed before they are allowed in. We prefer this
security and felt the cost of the license was justified.
Tracy
-----Original Message-----
From: Gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 9:11 AM
To: Andre DDAdmin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [FW1] Secure Client vs SecuRemote
Yeah, SecuRemote. SecureClient can be effectively disabled by the user
removing a checkbox ... and you have to pay for it.
--gill
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Andre DDAdmin wrote:
> Hi,
> Could anyone give me info on what would be the best to use if you
> want internet users to connect to your company LAN ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Andre'
>
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
--gill | Tatu Ylonen, SSH 1.2.12 README: "Beware that the most effective
| way for someone to decrypt your data may be with a rubber hose."
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
