I def think the 'User Manual' in PDF Format would be GREAT though... anyone else try going through each html page and hitting print? Big hastle!
You might say, well whats the difference between the two, isn't the wiki just a copy of the manual plus more? Kinda, but the wiki documents the moving project, whereas the User Manual ,IIRC, documents a specific release.
my $0.02
colin
On 10/10/06, André Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some people might want an offline documentation. One day, it might also be integrated into an IDE. Therefore we'll need a way to export the data. But as far as I know Andries is working on that.--On 10/10/06, Willie Alberty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Oct 10, 2006, at 9:00 AM, Gavin Vess wrote:
> Personally, I think the wiki is already better than http://
> framework.zend.com/manual
> I also think we can do a wiki to HTML that will look better than
> the existing pages.
I don't understand the point here. Confluence pages are already HTML.
Why should we need to duplicate the entire structure--and possibly
lose some interactive features--of the wiki manual as plain HTML so
that we can post it at a different URL? Why not simply direct users
straight to the wiki manual itself?
--
Willie Alberty, Owner
Spenlen Media
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.spenlen.com/
best regards,
André Hoffmann
ZF-Blog: http://andrehoffmann.wordpress.com/
