Kevin McArthur wrote:
Instead of an implicit ->addDefaultRoutes whould it not make more sense to have the defaults enabled by... default..
But they are, Kevin. Look at the RewriteRouter's constructor - there is a direct call to addDefaultRoutes.
and instead provide a removeDefaultRoutes() method for those who want to remove the default functionality?
That's the main reason why I have introduced the removeRoute method lately. But removeDefaultRoutes is another nice touch so I will probably add with the next commit.
Im curious what the purpose of addDefaultRoute's very existance is.
I have moved the default route creation into its own method primarily to clean the constructor and to make it more readable. And making it easier to override the default routes if you choose to subclass the router.
Kevin McArthur
-- Michael Minicki aka Martel Valgoerad | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://aie.pl/martel.asc =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "The incompetent with nothing to do can still make a mess of it." -- Laurence J. Peter
