On 2/26/07, Kevin McArthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill, > The benefit of this change is to simplify integration of a Zend > Framework tree in an application tree. You could use svn externals, for > instance. This brings up the question on whether this is how we want to recommend the deployment of the framework. I'm not recommending externals as an ideal deployment method, as it has some issues with backwards compatibility and accidental updates when not using a tagged version.
Agree. svn:externals could be configured to root of repository and those of us who wants to have updated version (I want :-) can just use this method. With properly configured include path this is not a problem. Using ZF in production and introducing to community will be simpler w/o unnecessary exceptions from the rules. -- Alexander http://www.alexatnet.com/
