On 26/02/07, Andrew Yager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
On 26/02/2007, at 8:58 PM, Ralf Eggert wrote:
> I personally think that the proposed renaming of the Zend class to
> Zend_Framework is very misleading. I would expect that a
> Zend_Framework
> class will set up the whole framework and not be just a funny
> conglomeration of methods who did not find their way to a proper
> component.
>
> Here are my suggestions:
>
> - move Zend::register(), Zend::registry(), Zend::isRegistered(),
> Zend::initRegistry() and Zend::__unsetRegistry() to Zend_Registry
>
> - drop Zend::exception() and Zend::loadInterface()
>
> - move Zend::loadClass(), Zend::loadFile() and Zend::isReadable() to
> a new Zend_Loader class
>
> - as suggested by others, move Zend::dump() to Zend_Debug
>
> - the only method I am not sure about yet is Zend::compareVersion()
> but
> I bet we will find a solution for this as well
I think that these suggestions are good. (and I must incidentally put my
support keeping the convention, rather than breaking it.)
Perhaps Zend::compareVersion would be best to put into a Zend_Framework
class as it seems to be a logical framework type function.
> Like others I would also suggest to implement these changes before the
> 0.9.0 beta release gets launched.
The sooner these changes can be made the better.
Andrew
That's the best way to go IMHO. Zend_Loader sounds well, and the same
goes to the other proposed class names. Just wanted to express my
support for this idea.
--
Regards,
Martin Martinov
