Right...
Don't forget the very essence of a framework. Yes, that is correct, a
framework, not a package repository. The framework will always be
released as a "whole", not in separated packages.
Current naming conventions are just fine. It's just Zend.php that could
use some reorganisation, as we "all" agreed.
Best,
Andriesss
Philip Iezzi schreef:
I'd prefer Zend_Filtered_Filthy_Fill_Filter_Filter_Filter !
This would make life so much easier.
To cache a cache may also be more efficient, who knows. I'd definitely use
Zend_Cache_Cache. We also do zip our jpegs, right?
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Really no need to tell if a given name represents a package or not. Zend
..Filter
....Filter.php contains Zend_Filter_Filter
....Alpha.php contains Zend_Filter_Alpha
Zend_Filter_Filter? So instead of Zend_Json we'd have Zend_Json_Json? I
don't like it at all.
It really does make sense and except for doubling up some of the top
level
class names has no impact on the current design.
I'm afraid Zend_Filter_Filter doesn't make any sense to me.
