Shahar,
I think it is up to your discretion. As you said, there are no clear
answers in the documentation.
In reality, there should probably be some kind of objective policy based on
dependency. Maybe when the "parent" classes are required (e.g.,
require_once) in order for the class to function?
-Matt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shahar Evron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "fw-general" <[email protected]>
Cc: "fw-webservices" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 2:27 AM
Subject: [fw-general] Class naming scheme: Zend_Http_CookieJar vs.
Zend_Http_Cookie_Jar
Hi,
A quick poll about naming conventions following ZF-1275:
http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-1275
Should a class like Zend_Http_CookieJar be renamed to
Zend_Http_Cookie_Jar, considering the facts that on one hand, some
people find the current name confusing, but on the other hand,
Zend_Http_CookieJar is not a logical or actual subclass of
Zend_Http_Cookie, but rather serves a whole different purpose of
containing Zend_Http_Cookie objects?
What do you think? I couldn't get any clear answer from the docs
regarding this.
TIA,
Shahar.
--
Shahar Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical Consultant
Zend Technologies
Mobile: +972 54 30 99 446
Office: +972 3 75 39 500 ext. 9546
