Hi Bryce,

Currently using a homebrewed system which would be forgiving of change since 
it's automated with a Factory. If the change is worthwhile and others agree I 
have no problem with change.

I read your proposal yesterday. I think the main thing I don't fully agree with 
it is the external message handling. It might be just a pet peeve but I'd 
prefer a set of Zend_Validate_Error classes I can rely on to compose errors and 
integrate i18n translations easily without pushing more responsibility onto a 
controller. Ah, I'll comment on it later :). Otherwise it's solid and I 
definitely appreciate the work you put into it.

Pádraic
 
Pádraic Brady
http://blog.astrumfutura.com
http://www.patternsforphp.com


----- Original Message ----
From: Bryce Lohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Zend FW General List <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 3:50:53 AM
Subject: [fw-general] Proposed backward-incompatible changes to Zend_Validate_* 
classes

Hi all,

I've proposed some changes to Zend_Validate_* classes that would not be 
backward 
compatible. Specifically, I had proposed to change the default behavior all the 
standard validators to consider the empty string a valid value.

Now, I've been operating under the assumption that hardly anyone is using the 
current Zend_Validate_* classes, due to the fact that it's a hassle to validate 
a lot of data at once. I figured that if few people were actually using these, 
then the cost of making this backward-incompatible change was low. The benefit 
of the change is that it would provide a lot of flexibility in the proposed 
Zend_Validate_Builder class.

I may be way off base with my assumption here, so I'd like to find out how many 
of you are actually using the current Zend_Validate_* classes. Obviously, if a 
lot of people are, in fact, using them, then it's not feasible to make this 
proposed change.

Regards,
Bryce Lohr







       
____________________________________________________________________________________Be
 a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. 
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469

Reply via email to