On Tuesday 26 June 2007 04:01, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > -- Arthur M. Kang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > There's plenty of interest. The issue right now is getting a stable and > tested version of ZF out the door that developers can rely on. We are in > RC status, which means, loosely, no new features, and bugfixes/security > fixes only. (I say loosely, as there have been a few new features > creeping in, but most have been backwards compatible or augment existing > functionality.)
The Zend_View Enhanced proposal is also backwards comaptible isn't it? Complex views are inherent in just about any serious site I come across these days and so an unnavoidable part of any real world demo a reviewer might write. So surely this is about as "core" as you can get in ZF? I have a site based on Perl written in 2001 that desparately needs a re-write and I must admit I did not think I'd be coding it using these old view techniques again 6 years later, but I too feel the urgency to get hold of a version 1 stable release so I can understand the pressure to lock it down. I just hope the independant reviewers don't continue to characterise ZF as no more than "promising" when 1.0 stable is announced. It deserves better. Regards, Mark Maynereid
